Many contemporary research funding instruments and research policies aim for excellence at the level of individual scientists, teams or research programmes. Good bibliometric approximations of related specialties could be useful for instance to help assign reviewers to applications. This paper reports findings on the usability of reviewer suggestions derived from a recently developed specialty approximation method combining key sources, title words, authors and references (Rons, 2018). Reviewer suggestions for applications for Senior Research Fellowships were made available to the evaluation coordinators. Those who were invited to review an application showed a normal acceptance rate, and responses from experts and coordinators contained no indications of mismatched scientific focus. The results confirm earlier indications that this specialty approximation method can successfully support tasks in research management.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI 2018) "Science, Technology and Innovation indicators in transition", 12-14 September 2018, Leiden, The Netherlands, Rodrigo Costas, Thomas Franssen, Alfredo Yegros-Yegros (Eds.)
PublisherLeiden University Press
Number of pages4
ISBN (Print)978-90-9031204-0
Publication statusPublished - 2018
EventSTI 2018 "Science, Technology and Innovation indicators in transition", Leiden - Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands
Duration: 12 Sep 201814 Sep 2018


ConferenceSTI 2018 "Science, Technology and Innovation indicators in transition", Leiden

    Research areas

  • Reviewer suggestions, Specialty approximation, Research evaluation

ID: 40163221